Samsung Galaxy M17e vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

The Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600; launch prices were $140 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads — 66/100 vs 43/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17e has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4300); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 23 points (66/100 vs 43/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M17e
Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 57
Value for money 64
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Performance 94
Display 80
Camera 35
Battery 37
Portability 80
Value for money 44
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17e better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4300 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $1099

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3271 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11051 vs 1980
  • Lighter: 180g vs 199g

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (80/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17e vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 scores 23 points higher (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e leads (52/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M17e — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 44/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (80/100 vs 57/100).

Samsung Galaxy M17e: The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M17e Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 524785 3161830
Geekbench Single 771 3271
Geekbench Multi 1980 11051
Display 6.7" PLS LCD 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 1080x2520
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4300 mAh
Charging 25W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Front camera 8 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP54 IP48
Dimensions 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g 180 g
Launch price $140 $1099
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17e
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17e
  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M17e
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M17e and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M17e MediaTek Dimensity 6300
43/100
524785 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
66/100 +83.4%
3161830 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 83.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M17e
$140
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
$1099

Launch price difference: $959. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $959 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (80/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17e notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (52/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (80/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 23 points (66/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17e and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy M17e has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17e or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (94/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17e over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.