Samsung Galaxy M17 vs TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $130 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads — 57/100 vs 48/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (953,150 vs 607,489); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M17
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $329
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (69/100 vs 47/100)
What makes TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 953150 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 1826
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (57/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (61/100 vs 33/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra scores 9 points higher (57/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M17 — 76/100, TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra are nearly equal (67/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (61/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (69/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 953150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 960 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1826 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 7.2" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 850 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $130 | $329 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- 7.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17 and TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 36.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $199. Samsung Galaxy M17 was $199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra are nearly equal (67/100 vs 63/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (61/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (69/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy M17 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads on performance (57/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.