Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 850, while the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) leads — 30/100 vs 19/100 (a 11-point difference).
Samsung Galaxy M13
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 44W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 192g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 vs the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India), the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) scores 11 points higher (30/100 vs 19/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the Samsung Galaxy M13 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 | Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 850 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.2×75.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 188 g | |
| Price | $149 | — |
Samsung Galaxy M13
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) and the Samsung Galaxy M13 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a bit better (65/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy M13 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) — 30/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 over the Vivo iQOO Z9 (India)?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z9 (India) is a better fit for everyday use.