Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (2022) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 33/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 234,339); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) is noticeably lighter (207g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) better?
- Lighter: 207g vs 223g
- Overall rating 33/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 234339
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 836
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 16/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 57/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 56 points higher (89/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 850 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×76.9×9.3 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) by 95.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (100/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (99/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (78/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) (90/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 4G (India) over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.