Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11

The Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7570, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $200 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 16/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 2400); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 is noticeably lighter (149g vs 210g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 by 60 points (76/100 vs 16/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
Performance 0
Display 51
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 81
Value for money 0
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 92
Portability 49
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 better?
  • Lighter: 149g vs 210g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $400

  • Better portability (81/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 122
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 405
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 2400 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (35/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 60 points higher (76/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (92/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (81/100 vs 49/100).

Samsung Galaxy J3 2017: The Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 Vivo iQOO Neo 11
Processor Samsung Exynos 7570 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3154662
Geekbench Single 122 3041
Geekbench Multi 405 9494
Display 5.0" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 2400 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 120W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 5 MP 16 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 16GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
NFC yes
Dimensions 143.2×70.3×8.2 mm
Weight 149 g 210 g
Launch price $200 $400
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
  • 5.0" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
  • 2400 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless charging: no data
92
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy J3 2017
$200
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
$400

Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 was $200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (92/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (35/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 (92/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (81/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 by 60 points (76/100 vs 16/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on camera score (35/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?

The Samsung Galaxy J3 2017 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.