Samsung Galaxy F54 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy F54 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 55/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 767,711); the Samsung Galaxy F54 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F54
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy F54 better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 223g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 767711
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2710
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F54 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 34 points higher (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (100/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F54 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F54 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 767711 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2710 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 5.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.9×77.3×8.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F54
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F54
- 6.7" Super AMOLED Plus
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F54
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F54 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy F54 by 86.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F54
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (100/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (78/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 (90/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F54 is a bit better (55/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F54 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F54 by 34 points (89/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F54 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy F54 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F54 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F54 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F54 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.