Samsung Galaxy F14 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy F14 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1330, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 44/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 607,489); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy F14 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy F14 is noticeably lighter (206g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F14
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy F14 better?
- Lighter: 206g vs 223g
- Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1826
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F14 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 45 points higher (89/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (100/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Samsung Galaxy F14 are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F14 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 960 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1826 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI Core 5.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 166.8×77.2×9.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F14
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F14
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F14
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F14 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy F14 by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F14
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (100/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (99/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (78/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 (90/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Samsung Galaxy F14 are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F14 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F14 by 45 points (89/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F14 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy F14 has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F14 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F14 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F14 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.