Samsung Galaxy F13 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy F13 (2022) runs on the Exynos 850, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 33/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 234,339); the Samsung Galaxy F13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F13
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy F13 better?
- Lighter: 207g vs 223g
- Overall rating 33/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 234339
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 836
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 16/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 57/100)
- Better portability (42/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F13 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 56 points higher (89/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Samsung Galaxy F13 are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F13 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 850 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.6" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.4×76.9×9.3 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F13
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F13
- 6.6" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F13
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F13 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy F13 by 95.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F13
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (100/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (99/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (78/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 (90/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Samsung Galaxy F13 are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F13 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F13 by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F13 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy F13 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F13 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F13 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F13 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.