Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (2026) runs on the Exynos 1480, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $299 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 54/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 849,080); the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G is noticeably lighter (185g vs 215g).
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Lighter: 185g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $2199
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 66/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 849080
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1140
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3346
- Faster charging: 60W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (67/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 24 points higher (78/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 33/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A27 5G — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 60/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (67/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G is a bit better (74/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1480 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 849080 | 3453998 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1140 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3346 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Weight | 185 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $299 | $2199 |
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A27 5G by 75.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1900. Samsung Galaxy A27 5G was $1900 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (96/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G (67/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G is a bit better (74/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G by 24 points (78/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 5G has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 78/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A27 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.