Samsung Galaxy A26 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Samsung Galaxy A26 (2025) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $250 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 50/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A26 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 754,064); the Samsung Galaxy A26 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 25 points (75/100 vs 50/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A26

Performance 52
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 44
Portability 63
Value for money 50

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

What makes Samsung Galaxy A26 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Lighter: 200g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (44/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 754064
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1008
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2710
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 34/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 63/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A26 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 25 points higher (75/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 34/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A26 — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (76/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 63/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A26 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor Exynos 1380 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 754064 3065623
Geekbench Single 1008 2910
Geekbench Multi 2710 9174
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2340 2184x1968
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 25W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 145
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP67 IP48
Dimensions 164.0×77.5×7.7 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 200 g 215 g
Launch price $250 $1999

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A26

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A26 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A26 Exynos 1380
50/100
754064 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100 +75.4%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Samsung Galaxy A26 by 75.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A26

$250

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Launch price difference: $1749. Samsung Galaxy A26 was $1749 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (91/100 vs 52/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 (76/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A26 is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Samsung Galaxy A26 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A26 by 25 points (75/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy A26 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 52/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A26 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.