Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
The Samsung Galaxy A25 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G (2022) runs on the Exynos 1280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A25 leads — 48/100 vs 45/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A25 is thinner (8.3mm vs 9.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
What makes Samsung Galaxy A25 better?
- Lighter: 197g vs 198g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy M33 5G better?
- Overall rating 45/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A25 vs the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A25 scores 3 points higher (48/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G are nearly equal (34/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100. In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is a bit better (58/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A25 | Samsung Galaxy M33 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 | Exynos 1280 | |
| AnTuTu | 615425 | 615425 | |
| Geekbench Single | 956 | 956 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2082 | 2082 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.6" TFT LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×76.5×8.3 mm | 165.4×76.9×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A25
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A25
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- 6.6" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A25
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M33 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A25 and Samsung Galaxy M33 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 47/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G are nearly equal (34/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A25 is a bit better (58/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A25 or the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy A25 edges out the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A25 and the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy A25 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G — 45/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A25 over the Samsung Galaxy M33 5G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Samsung Galaxy A25 (80/100 vs 66/100).