Samsung Galaxy A04 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy A04 (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 43/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A04 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A04 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A04
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy A04 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 223g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A04 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 46 points higher (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A04 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A04 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×76.3×9.1 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A04
- 6.5" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A04
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A04
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 (99/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 (90/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A04 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A04 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A04 by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A04 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy A04 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A04 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A04 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.