Samsung Galaxy A03s vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

The Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $130 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads — 70/100 vs 25/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A03s has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 199,111); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03s doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is thinner (7.3mm vs 9.1mm).

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 45 points (70/100 vs 25/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A03s
Performance 19
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 50
Value for money 30
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 52
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03s better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $999

  • Overall rating 25/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 199111
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 476
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 828
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 190g vs 196g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better camera (40/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (54/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03s vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ scores 45 points higher (70/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (91/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (40/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A03s — 30/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (91/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (89/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (40/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Samsung Galaxy A03s are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (72/100 vs 50/100).

Samsung Galaxy A03s: The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A03s Samsung Galaxy S26+
Processor MediaTek Helio P35 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 199111 3161830
Geekbench Single 476 2900
Geekbench Multi 828 9200
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 3120x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4900 mAh
Charging 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 5 MP 12 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB / 4GB 12GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 196 g 190 g
Launch price $130 $999
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A03s
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A03s and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A03s MediaTek Helio P35
25/100
199111 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100 +93.7%
3161830 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Samsung Galaxy A03s by 93.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A03s
$130
Samsung Galaxy S26+
$999

Launch price difference: $869. Samsung Galaxy A03s was $869 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (91/100 vs 19/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (89/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (40/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Samsung Galaxy A03s are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (72/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03s or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 45 points (70/100 vs 25/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03s and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A03s or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A03s or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 19/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03s over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.