Redmi Turbo 5 vs ZTE Blade V50
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) is priced at $250, the ZTE Blade V50 (2023) at $351. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 32/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4800); the ZTE Blade V50 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 204g).
Redmi Turbo 5
ZTE Blade V50
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Cheaper: $250 vs $351
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 35/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 86/100)
- Lighter: 178g vs 204g
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the ZTE Blade V50, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 22 points higher (54/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (72/100 vs 35/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (77/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (93/100 vs 86/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | ZTE Blade V50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | — | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 161.9×72.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 178 g | |
| Price | $250 | $351 |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
ZTE Blade V50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V50
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $101. Redmi Turbo 5 is cheaper by $101.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (43/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (72/100 vs 35/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade V50 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (77/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (93/100 vs 86/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 by 22 points (54/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the ZTE Blade V50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the ZTE Blade V50 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (32/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the ZTE Blade V50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the ZTE Blade V50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V50 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.