Redmi Turbo 5 vs Vivo Y600 Pro
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Vivo Y600 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300; estimated prices are $250 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 40/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y600 Pro has the bigger battery (10200 mAh vs 7560); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 877,641).
Redmi Turbo 5
Vivo Y600 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 2/100)
- Bigger battery: 10200 vs 7560 mAh
- Better camera (34/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 72/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Vivo Y600 Pro, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 14 points higher (54/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 2/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y600 Pro (43/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y600 Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y600 Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 72/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y600 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 93/100.
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Vivo Y600 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 10200 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 204 g | — | |
| Price | $250 | $250 |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo Y600 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y600 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y600 Pro
- 10200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Vivo Y600 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Vivo Y600 Pro by 220.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $0. Same price.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y600 Pro (43/100 vs 2/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y600 Pro and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (34/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y600 Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 72/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y600 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 93/100.
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo Y600 Pro?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y600 Pro — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Vivo Y600 Pro?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo Y600 Pro — 40/100.
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Vivo Y600 Pro?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Vivo Y600 Pro?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y600 Pro is a better fit for those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.