Redmi Turbo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 66/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,112,047); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2112047
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Lighter: 201g vs 204g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 8 points higher (74/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (74/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2112047 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | — |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 46.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (98/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (74/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (74/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.