Redmi Turbo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 66/100 vs 64/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is faster in AnTuTu (2,345,563 vs 2,112,047); the Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably lighter (204g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Lighter: 204g vs 236g
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2345563 vs 2112047
- Better Geekbench Single: 2203 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6511 vs 6405
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 2 points higher (66/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is a bit better (82/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (74/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2112047 | 2345563 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 4 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 157.9×142.6×4.9 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | — |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 4MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special leads Redmi Turbo 5 by 10.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is a bit better (82/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (74/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special?
The Redmi Turbo 5 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special leads on camera score (51/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special leads on performance (82/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is a better fit for gamers and power users.