Redmi Turbo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400; launch prices were $250 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads — 68/100 vs 66/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4700); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,112,047 vs 2,000,659).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2112047 vs 2000659
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $599
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 FE better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2115 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6826 vs 6405
- Lighter: 190g vs 204g
- Higher performance (80/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (56/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (71/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE scores 2 points higher (68/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (74/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (71/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Samsung Galaxy S25 FE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Samsung Exynos 2400 | |
| AnTuTu | 2112047 | 2000659 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2115 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 6826 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 118 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 1900 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 161.3×76.6×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $599 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 FE
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Samsung Galaxy S25 FE by 5.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $349. Redmi Turbo 5 was $349 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE and the Redmi Turbo 5 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (56/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE (74/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (71/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE — 68/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leads on camera score (56/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE is a better fit for gamers and power users.