Redmi Turbo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy A57
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy A57 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1680; launch prices were $250 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 66/100 vs 57/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,112,047 vs 1,390,055); the Samsung Galaxy A57 is noticeably lighter (183g vs 204g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5
Samsung Galaxy A57
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2112047 vs 1390055
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1382
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 4477
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $350
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A57 better?
- Lighter: 183g vs 204g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy A57, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 9 points higher (66/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 — 82/100, Samsung Galaxy A57 — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy A57 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (74/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A57 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (80/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Samsung Galaxy A57 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Samsung Exynos 1680 | |
| AnTuTu | 2112047 | 1390055 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 1382 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 4477 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 1900 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 161.5×76.8×6.9 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 183 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $350 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy A57
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A57
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A57
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Samsung Galaxy A57, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Samsung Galaxy A57 by 51.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Redmi Turbo 5 was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy A57 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A57 (74/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A57 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (80/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A57?
The Redmi Turbo 5 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A57 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy A57?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy A57 — 57/100.
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A57?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (77/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Samsung Galaxy A57?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A57 is a better fit for active users.