Redmi Turbo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G; estimated prices are $250 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 35/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 781,542); the Samsung Galaxy A52s is noticeably lighter (189g vs 204g).
Redmi Turbo 5
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 781542
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Cheaper: $250 vs $449
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 1/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 25/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 79/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 204g
- Better camera (48/100 vs 32/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy A52s, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 19 points higher (54/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s leads (48/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (93/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (43/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (48/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (72/100 vs 25/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (63/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Samsung Galaxy A52s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | 781542 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 1017 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 2943 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.5" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 204 g | 189 g | |
| Price | $250 | $449 |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A52s
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Samsung Galaxy A52s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Samsung Galaxy A52s by 259.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $199. Redmi Turbo 5 is cheaper by $199.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (43/100 vs 1/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (48/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52s (72/100 vs 25/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52s notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (63/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A52s?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A52s — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy A52s?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy A52s — 35/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A52s?
The Samsung Galaxy A52s leads on camera score (48/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A52s?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 1/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Samsung Galaxy A52s?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.