Redmi Turbo 5 vs Samsung Galaxy A50
The Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy A50 (2019) runs on the Exynos 9610; estimated prices are $250 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 14/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 25 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 352,871); the Samsung Galaxy A50 is noticeably lighter (166g vs 204g).
Redmi Turbo 5
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 352871
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 370
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 1021
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 25MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper: $250 vs $350
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 15/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 86/100)
- Lighter: 166g vs 204g
- Better design/ergonomics (92/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy A50, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 40 points higher (54/100 vs 14/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (32/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (32/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (72/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A50 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (92/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (93/100 vs 86/100).
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 | Samsung Galaxy A50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | Exynos 9610 | |
| AnTuTu | 2809170 | 352871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1553 | 370 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6403 | 1021 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2756x1268 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 7560 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 25 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 25 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | 158.5×74.7×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 166 g | |
| Price | $250 | $350 |
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Main: 25MP
- Front: 25MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A50
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 and Samsung Galaxy A50, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Samsung Galaxy A50 by 696.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $100. Redmi Turbo 5 is cheaper by $100.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (43/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (32/100 vs 15/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 (72/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A50 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (92/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (93/100 vs 86/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A50 by 40 points (54/100 vs 14/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy A50 — 14/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (32/100 vs 15/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 or the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 over the Samsung Galaxy A50?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.