Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400; launch prices were $300 and $849. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 60/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 219g).

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 45
Value for money 80

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Performance 79
Display 82
Camera 35
Battery 31
Portability 78
Value for money 34

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 1841283
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $849

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better?

  • Lighter: 187g vs 219g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 45/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 11 points higher (71/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — 34/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (80/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (78/100 vs 45/100).

Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Turbo 5 Max Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Samsung Exynos 2400
AnTuTu 2726802 1841283
Geekbench Single 2725 2115
Geekbench Multi 8932 6826
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2772x1280 2640x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9000 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm
Weight 219 g 187 g
Launch price $300 $849

Camera comparison

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100
2726802 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
60/100 -48.1%
1841283 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 48.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

$300

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

$849

Launch price difference: $549. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $549 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (80/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (78/100 vs 45/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — 60/100.

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 79/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users.