Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e; launch prices were $300 and $649. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 67/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4700); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 1,849,346).

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max edges out the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 45
Value for money 80

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

Performance 76
Display 79
Camera 67
Battery 46
Portability 51
Value for money 48

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 1849346
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 5500
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $649

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?

  • Lighter: 213g vs 219g

  • Better camera (67/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 45/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 4 points higher (71/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE leads (67/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (67/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).

Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Turbo 5 Max Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Samsung Exynos 2400e
AnTuTu 2726802 1849346
Geekbench Single 2725 1850
Geekbench Multi 8932 5500
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2772x1280 2340x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9000 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 133
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 14 / One UI 6.1
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm
Weight 219 g 213 g
Launch price $300 $649

Camera comparison

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100
2726802 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE Samsung Exynos 2400e
67/100 -47.4%
1849346 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 47.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

$300

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

$649

Launch price difference: $349. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $349 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (67/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (80/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max edges out the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 67/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE leads on camera score (67/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users.