Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870; launch prices were $300 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 21/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 16 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 192,269); the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 219g).

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 by 50 points (71/100 vs 21/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 37
Battery 80
Portability 45
Value for money 80

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

Performance 11
Display 48
Camera 14
Battery 15
Portability 83
Value for money 0

What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 192269
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 172
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 492
  • Bigger battery: 9000 vs 3000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $400

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 11/100)
  • Better camera (37/100 vs 14/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 better?

  • Lighter: 162g vs 219g

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 45/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 50 points higher (71/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (37/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 — 0/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (89/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (84/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (37/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (80/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (83/100 vs 45/100).

Redmi Turbo 5 Max: The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Turbo 5 Max Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Samsung Exynos 7870
AnTuTu 2726802 192269
Geekbench Single 2725 172
Geekbench Multi 8932 492
Display 6.8" AMOLED 5.6" Super AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1280 1480x720
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 9000 mAh 3000 mAh
Charging 100W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 16 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 20 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 3GB / 4GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 32GB / 64GB
OS Android 16 Android 8.0
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm 160.2×75.7×7.9 mm
Weight 219 g 162 g
Launch price $300 $400

Camera comparison

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

  • Main: 16MP f/1.7
  • Front: 16MP
14
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

  • 5.6" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1480x720
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
48
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

  • 9000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

  • 3000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Samsung Galaxy A6 2018, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Turbo 5 Max MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
71/100
2726802 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Samsung Exynos 7870
21/100 -1318.2%
192269 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 by 1318.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Turbo 5 Max

$300

Samsung Galaxy A6 2018

$400

Launch price difference: $100. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (89/100 vs 11/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (84/100 vs 48/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (37/100 vs 14/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (80/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (83/100 vs 45/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 by 50 points (71/100 vs 21/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 — 21/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on camera score (37/100 vs 14/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 11/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Samsung Galaxy A6 2018?

The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.