Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Samsung Galaxy A52
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy A52 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G; launch prices were $300 and $400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 46/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 517,460); the Samsung Galaxy A52 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Samsung Galaxy A52
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 517460
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 1762
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $400
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A52 better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 219g
- Better camera (45/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 45/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs the Samsung Galaxy A52, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 25 points higher (71/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy A52 — 20/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (89/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (61/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | Samsung Galaxy A52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | |
| AnTuTu | 2726802 | 517460 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 1762 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1280 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP67 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | 159.9×75.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 219 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $400 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy A52
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A52
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A52
- 4500 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Samsung Galaxy A52, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads Samsung Galaxy A52 by 427.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (89/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (84/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 (80/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A52 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (61/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A52?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A52 by 25 points (71/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the Samsung Galaxy A52?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy A52 — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A52?
The Samsung Galaxy A52 leads on camera score (45/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max or the Samsung Galaxy A52?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 5 Max over the Samsung Galaxy A52?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.