Redmi Turbo 3 vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Redmi Turbo 3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 63/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,823,082); the Redmi Turbo 3 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 223g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Turbo 3

Performance 75
Display 83
Camera 37
Battery 58
Portability 73
Value for money —

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Redmi Turbo 3 better?

  • Lighter: 179g vs 223g

  • Better portability (73/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1823082
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1923
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 5179
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Turbo 3 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 26 points higher (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (100/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (78/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 3 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (73/100 vs 42/100).

Redmi Turbo 3: The Redmi Turbo 3 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Turbo 3 Vivo iQOO 16
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 1823082 5498720
Geekbench Single 1923 4327
Geekbench Multi 5179 12873
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1220x2712 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 90W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, HyperOS Android 17
Brightness (peak) 2400 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 160.5×74.4×7.8 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 179 g 223 g
Launch price — $840

Camera comparison

Redmi Turbo 3

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Turbo 3

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1220x2712
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Turbo 3

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Turbo 3 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Turbo 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
63/100
1823082 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +66.8%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads Redmi Turbo 3 by 66.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Turbo 3

Price unknown

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (100/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (78/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 (90/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Turbo 3 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (73/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Turbo 3 or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 3 by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Turbo 3 and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Redmi Turbo 3 has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Turbo 3 or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Turbo 3 or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Turbo 3 over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Redmi Turbo 3 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.