Redmi Note 9S vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Redmi Note 9S (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 20/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP.
Redmi Note 9S
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Better camera (29/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5020 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Lighter: 203g vs 210g
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (46/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 9S vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 11 points higher (31/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 9S leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 9S and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 9S significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 9S | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 514398 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 203 g | |
| Price | $200 | — |
Redmi Note 9S
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 9S
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 9S
- 5020 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 9S and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (46/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 9S significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 9S or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 9S — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 9S and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Redmi Note 9S has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Redmi Note 9S over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.