Redmi Note 9S vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi Note 9S (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $200 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 39/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5020); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 514,398); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 9S doesn't; the Redmi Note 9S is noticeably lighter (210g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 50 points (89/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 9S
Performance 41
Display 42
Camera 34
Battery 43
Portability 44
Value for money 40
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Redmi Note 9S better?
  • Lighter: 210g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $799

  • Better portability (44/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 514398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1762
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5020 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 9S vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 50 points higher (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Redmi Note 9S — 40/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (99/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 9S is a bit better (44/100 vs 35/100).

Redmi Note 9S: The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 9S Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 514398 4602290
Geekbench Single 746 3640
Geekbench Multi 1762 11033
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5020 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 18W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 450 nits 8000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 165.8×76.7×8.8 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 210 g 227 g
Launch price $200 $799
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 9S
  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
34
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 9S
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
42
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 9S
  • 5020 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 9S and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
39/100
514398 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +88.8%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 9S by 88.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 9S
$200
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Launch price difference: $599. Redmi Note 9S was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (99/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (99/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (78/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S (92/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 9S is a bit better (44/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 9S or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 9S by 50 points (89/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 9S and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 9S has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 9S or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 9S or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 9S over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 9S is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.