Redmi Note 8 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Redmi Note 8 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $180 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 30/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 329,457); the Vivo iQOO 15 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 8 doesn't; the Redmi Note 8 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 by 56 points (86/100 vs 30/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 8
Performance 24
Display 43
Camera 33
Battery 22
Portability 60
Value for money 28
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Redmi Note 8 better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $599

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 329457
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 321
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1128
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better value for money (84/100 vs 28/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 8 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 56 points higher (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 24/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (94/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (78/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 8 is a bit better (60/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (84/100 vs 28/100).

Redmi Note 8: The Redmi Note 8 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 8 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 329457 3740528
Geekbench Single 321 3041
Geekbench Multi 1128 9494
Display 6.3" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 158.3×75.3×8.4 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 190 g 215 g
Launch price $180 $599
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 8
  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 8
  • 6.3" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
43
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 8
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 8 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
30/100
329457 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +91.2%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Redmi Note 8 by 91.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 8
$180
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Launch price difference: $419. Redmi Note 8 was $419 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (94/100 vs 24/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (99/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (78/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (85/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 8 is a bit better (60/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 (84/100 vs 28/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 8 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 8 by 56 points (86/100 vs 30/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 8 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Redmi Note 8 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 8 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 8 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 8 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Redmi Note 8 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.