Redmi Note 17 vs Samsung Galaxy A17

The Redmi Note 17 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; launch prices were $185 and $147. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 17 leads — 50/100 vs 45/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi Note 17 is faster in AnTuTu (593,849 vs 554,590); the Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 225g).

The Redmi Note 17 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A17 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 17

Performance 48
Display 78
Camera 30
Battery 64
Portability 41
Value for money 64

Samsung Galaxy A17

Performance 43
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 70
Value for money 66

What makes Redmi Note 17 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 593849 vs 554590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2328 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (48/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 67/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 225g
  • Cheaper at launch: $147 vs $185

  • Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 17 vs the Samsung Galaxy A17, the Redmi Note 17 scores 5 points higher (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 leads (64/100 vs 44/100). Value score: Redmi Note 17 — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy A17 — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 17 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 17 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Redmi Note 17 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 (70/100 vs 41/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 17 Samsung Galaxy A17
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu 593849 554590
Geekbench Single 952 727
Geekbench Multi 2328 2047
Display 7.0" OLED 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2396 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 45W 25W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 8 MP 13 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits 800 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP54
Dimensions 169.7×79.1×8.3 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 225 g 190 g
Launch price $185 $147

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 17

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 17

  • 7.0" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2396
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 17

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Samsung Galaxy A17

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 17 and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 17 Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
50/100
593849 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 MediaTek Helio G99
45/100 -7.1%
554590 AnTuTu

Redmi Note 17 leads Samsung Galaxy A17 by 7.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 17

$185

Samsung Galaxy A17

$147

Launch price difference: $38. Samsung Galaxy A17 was $38 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Note 17 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 17 is a bit better (78/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Redmi Note 17 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (64/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 (70/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Redmi Note 17 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A17 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 and the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Redmi Note 17 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 45/100.

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Redmi Note 17 leads on performance (48/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 over the Samsung Galaxy A17?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Samsung Galaxy A17 (70/100 vs 41/100).