Redmi Note 15 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

The Redmi Note 15 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $300 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 59/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 6580); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 876,387); the Redmi Note 15 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 225g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 15 Pro

Performance 56
Display 83
Camera 49
Battery 58
Portability 65
Value for money 56

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 190g vs 225g
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $548

  • Better camera (49/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (65/100 vs 38/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 876387
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2939
  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 6580 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 56/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 16 points higher (75/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro leads (49/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Redmi Note 15 Pro — 56/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (95/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (65/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 15 Pro Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
AnTuTu 876387 3579952
Geekbench Single 1050 3293
Geekbench Multi 2939 10243
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
Resolution 2700x1224 1440x3200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6580 mAh 9100 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 20 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×8.0 mm 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 190 g 225 g
Launch price $300 $548

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 15 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
49
camera

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 15 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2700x1224
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 15 Pro

  • 6580 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 15 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 15 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra
59/100
876387 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100 +75.5%
3579952 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Redmi Note 15 Pro by 75.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 15 Pro

$300

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Launch price difference: $248. Redmi Note 15 Pro was $248 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (95/100 vs 56/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro is a bit better (49/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro (80/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (65/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is noticeably better than the Redmi Note 15 Pro — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 15 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 15 Pro leads on camera score (49/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 56/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.