Redmi Note 15 Pro+ vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $370 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 62/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 1,041,898); the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (192g vs 223g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 15 Pro+

Performance 60
Display 83
Camera 49
Battery 68
Portability 62
Value for money 56

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Redmi Note 15 Pro+ better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 192g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $370 vs $840

  • Better portability (62/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 1041898
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 3168
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 49/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 27 points higher (89/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Redmi Note 15 Pro+ — 56/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (100/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (62/100 vs 42/100).

Redmi Note 15 Pro+: The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Vivo iQOO 16
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 1041898 5498720
Geekbench Single 1223 4327
Geekbench Multi 3168 12873
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2700x1224 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 90W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.3×78.3×8.2 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 192 g 223 g
Launch price $370 $840

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 15 Pro+

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
49
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 15 Pro+

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2700x1224
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 15 Pro+

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 15 Pro+ and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 15 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
62/100
1041898 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +81.1%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads Redmi Note 15 Pro+ by 81.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 15 Pro+

$370

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Launch price difference: $470. Redmi Note 15 Pro+ was $470 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (100/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (99/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (78/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (90/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (62/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 15 Pro+ over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Redmi Note 15 Pro+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.