Redmi Note 14 vs Redmi Note 14 (China)
The Redmi Note 14 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Redmi Note 14 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 14 leads — 53/100 vs 50/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Note 14 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 14 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 14
Redmi Note 14 (China)
What makes Redmi Note 14 better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (44/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Redmi Note 14 (China) better?
- Overall rating 50/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 14 vs the Redmi Note 14 (China), the Redmi Note 14 scores 3 points higher (53/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 14 leads (44/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 49/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 14 is a bit better (44/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 65/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 14 | Redmi Note 14 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 668462 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 969 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 2321 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5110 mAh | 5110 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 103 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 2100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm | 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $199 | — |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 14
- Main: 108MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 14
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 14
- 5110 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 5110 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 14 and Redmi Note 14 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 49/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 14 is a bit better (44/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 65/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 or the Redmi Note 14 (China)?
The Redmi Note 14 edges out the Redmi Note 14 (China) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 and the Redmi Note 14 (China)?
The Redmi Note 14 has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Redmi Note 14 (China) — 50/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 or the Redmi Note 14 (China)?
The Redmi Note 14 leads on camera score (44/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 over the Redmi Note 14 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Redmi Note 14 (44/100 vs 32/100).