Redmi Note 14 (China) vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Redmi Note 14 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5110); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 668,462); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 14 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 14 (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Redmi Note 14 (China) better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 223g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 668462
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 969
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2321
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5110 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 49/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 14 (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (100/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (90/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (65/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 14 (China) | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 668462 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 969 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2321 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5110 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 14 (China)
- 5110 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 14 (China) and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Redmi Note 14 (China) by 87.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 14 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (100/100 vs 49/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (78/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) (90/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (65/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (China) by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 (China) and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Redmi Note 14 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 (China) over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.