Redmi Note 13R vs Samsung Galaxy M35
The Redmi Note 13R (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M35 leads — 32/100 vs 29/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M35 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5030); the Redmi Note 13R is noticeably lighter (205g vs 222g).
Redmi Note 13R
Samsung Galaxy M35
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Lighter: 205g vs 222g
- Better design/ergonomics (43/100 vs 22/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5030 mAh
- Better camera (29/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 41/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13R vs the Samsung Galaxy M35, the Samsung Galaxy M35 scores 3 points higher (32/100 vs 29/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (29/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13R notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (43/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13R (93/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 13R | Samsung Galaxy M35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4+ Gen 2 | Exynos 1380 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 768212 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1008 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2758 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5030 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 550 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×76.3×8.2 mm | 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 222 g | |
| Price | — | $249 |
Redmi Note 13R
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Redmi Note 13R
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13R
- 5030 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 13R
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (29/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13R notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (43/100 vs 22/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M35 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13R (93/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13R or the Samsung Galaxy M35?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 edges out the Redmi Note 13R by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13R and the Samsung Galaxy M35?
The Redmi Note 13R has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Samsung Galaxy M35 — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13R or the Samsung Galaxy M35?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 leads on camera score (29/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13R over the Samsung Galaxy M35?
The Redmi Note 13R is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.