Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G vs Vivo Y77 (China)

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads — 39/100 vs 29/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is noticeably better than the Vivo Y77 (China) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 46
Battery 48
Design 65
Value for money 96
Vivo Y77 (China)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 39
Design 57
Value for money 55
What makes Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 188g vs 194g

  • Better camera (46/100 vs 24/100)
  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 67W

  • Overall rating 29/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G scores 10 points higher (39/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads (46/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (46/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a bit better (65/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (96/100 vs 55/100).

Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo Y77 (China): The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Vivo Y77 (China)
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 930
AnTuTu 408000
Geekbench Single 760
Geekbench Multi 1890
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 1080x2388
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 67W 80W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 16 MP 8 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP54
Dimensions 161.1×75.0×8.0 mm 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm
Weight 188 g 194 g
Price $200
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
46
camera
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Vivo Y77 (China)
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
39
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
$200
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (46/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a bit better (65/100 vs 57/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (96/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is noticeably better than the Vivo Y77 (China) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G and the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads on camera score (46/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G over the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.