Redmi Note 13 (China) vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Redmi Note 13 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 33/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 524,785); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 13 (China) doesn't; the Redmi Note 13 (China) is noticeably lighter (173g vs 227g).
Redmi Note 13 (China)
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 173g vs 227g
- Better design/ergonomics (83/100 vs 16/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 38/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 13 (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 51 points higher (84/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 38/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (74/100 vs 38/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (83/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Redmi Note 13 (China) | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×75.0×7.6 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 173 g | 227 g | |
| Price | — | $799 |
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Redmi Note 13 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Redmi Note 13 (China) and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 13 (China) by 88.6% in our overall performance rating.
Redmi Note 13 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (97/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (74/100 vs 38/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) (86/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (83/100 vs 16/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 13 (China) by 51 points (84/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 13 (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 38/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 13 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 13 (China) over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 13 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.