Redmi Note 10 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi Note 10 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $200 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 42/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 510,711); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi Note 10 doesn't; the Redmi Note 10 is noticeably lighter (179g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 by 47 points (89/100 vs 42/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 10
Performance 40
Display 51
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 68
Value for money 46
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Redmi Note 10 better?
  • Lighter: 179g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $799

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 510711
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 714
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1577
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 10 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 47 points higher (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Redmi Note 10 — 46/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (68/100 vs 35/100).

Redmi Note 10: The Redmi Note 10 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi Note 10 Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 510711 4602290
Geekbench Single 714 3640
Geekbench Multi 1577 11033
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1100 nits 8000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP53 IP68
Dimensions 160.5×74.5×8.3 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 179 g 227 g
Launch price $200 $799
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 10
  • Main: 48MP
  • Front: 13MP
30
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Redmi Note 10
  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 10
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 10 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
42/100
510711 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +88.9%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi Note 10 by 88.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 10
$200
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Launch price difference: $599. Redmi Note 10 was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (99/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (78/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 (92/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 10 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (68/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 10 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 10 by 47 points (89/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 10 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 10 has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 10 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 10 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 10 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi Note 10 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.