Redmi K90 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

The Redmi K90 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; launch prices were $420 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 63/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Ultra has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 4500); the Redmi K90 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,233,695 vs 1,436,963); the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is noticeably lighter (209g vs 227g).

The Redmi K90 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K90 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 37
Battery 78
Portability 40
Value for money 72

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 63
Battery 42
Portability 51
Value for money 40

What makes Redmi K90 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3233695 vs 1436963
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
  • Bigger battery: 8550 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $420 vs $599

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 69/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 FE better?

  • Lighter: 209g vs 227g

  • Better camera (63/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 40/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, the Redmi K90 Ultra scores 10 points higher (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE leads (63/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Ultra — 72/100, Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — 40/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (63/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).

Redmi K90 Ultra: The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K90 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3233695 1436963
Geekbench Single 3013 1662
Geekbench Multi 9287 4188
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.4" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1280x2772 2340x1080
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8550 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 127
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 20 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 1450 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm 158.0×76.5×8.2 mm
Weight 227 g 209 g
Launch price $420 $599

Camera comparison

Redmi K90 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K90 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2772
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

  • 6.4" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K90 Ultra

  • 8550 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
78
battery

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
73/100
3233695 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
63/100 -125.0%
1436963 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S23 FE by 125.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K90 Ultra

$420

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

$599

Launch price difference: $179. Redmi K90 Ultra was $179 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (92/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (63/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (78/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K90 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Redmi K90 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Redmi K90 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE leads on camera score (63/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Redmi K90 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE?

The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is a better fit for active users.