Redmi K90 Pro Max vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

The Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $561 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 86/100 vs 65/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 7560); the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,622,315 vs 2,052,566).

The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi K90 Pro Max

Performance 97
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 89
Portability 54
Value for money 90

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

Performance 76
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 71
Portability 51
Value for money 80

What makes Redmi K90 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3622315 vs 2052566
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Lighter: 210g vs 212g

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?

  • Bigger battery: 7620 vs 7560 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $561

  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K90 Pro Max vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 21 points higher (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (97/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 71/100). Value score: Redmi K90 Pro Max — 90/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (97/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (89/100 vs 71/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).

Redmi K90 Pro Max: The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi K90 Pro Max Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8400
AnTuTu 3622315 2052566
Geekbench Single 3639 1579
Geekbench Multi 11047 6100
Display 6.9" OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2608x1200 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7560 mAh 7620 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 4400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP65
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm
Weight 210 g 212 g
Launch price $561 $250

Camera comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 6.9" OLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Redmi K90 Pro Max

  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 7620 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K90 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K90 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100
3622315 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 8400
65/100 -76.5%
2052566 AnTuTu

Redmi K90 Pro Max leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by 76.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi K90 Pro Max

$561

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

$250

Launch price difference: $311. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo was $311 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (97/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (78/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (89/100 vs 71/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by 21 points (86/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K90 Pro Max and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K90 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K90 Pro Max over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.