Redmi K80 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy J7 2017

The Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7870; estimated prices are $511 and $320. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 8/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,014,660 vs 192,269); the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is noticeably lighter (181g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 63 points (71/100 vs 8/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K80 Pro
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 63
Battery 79
Design 31
Value for money 75
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 1
Battery 1
Design 73
Value for money 88
What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3014660 vs 192269
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 172
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 492
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3600 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 1/100)
  • Longer battery life (79/100 vs 1/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 better?
  • Lighter: 181g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $320 vs $511

  • Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (88/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi K80 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 63 points higher (71/100 vs 8/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (63/100 vs 1/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (79/100 vs 1/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 leads (88/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (63/100 vs 1/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (79/100 vs 1/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (73/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is a bit better (88/100 vs 75/100).

Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017: The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi K80 Pro Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 7870
AnTuTu 3014660 192269
Geekbench Single 3050 172
Geekbench Multi 9300 492
Display 6.7" AMOLED 5.5" AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 3600 mAh
Charging 120W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 20 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 3GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 16GB
OS Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm 152.5×74.8×8.0 mm
Weight 215 g 181 g
Price $511 $320
Camera comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
63
camera
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 13MP
1
camera
Display comparison
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
  • 5.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Battery and charging
Redmi K80 Pro
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
79
battery
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
  • 3600 mAh
  • No wireless charging
1
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi K80 Pro and Samsung Galaxy J7 2017, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100
3014660 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Samsung Exynos 7870
8/100 -1467.9%
192269 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 1467.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi K80 Pro
$511
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
$320

Price difference: $191. Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is cheaper by $191.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (68/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (63/100 vs 1/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (79/100 vs 1/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (73/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is a bit better (88/100 vs 75/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017?

The Redmi K80 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 by 63 points (71/100 vs 8/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi K80 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017?

The Redmi K80 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 — 8/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 1/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi K80 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (68/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi K80 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy J7 2017?

The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.