Redmi K70 Pro vs Vivo Y500
The Redmi K70 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo Y500 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300; estimated prices are $465 and $345. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K70 Pro leads — 58/100 vs 36/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 has the bigger battery (8100 mAh vs 5000); the Redmi K70 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y500 doesn't.
Redmi K70 Pro
Vivo Y500
- Faster charging: 120W vs 44W
- Lighter: 209g vs 210g
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 34/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (38/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 8100 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper: $345 vs $465
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 78/100)
Comparing the Redmi K70 Pro vs the Vivo Y500, the Redmi K70 Pro scores 22 points higher (58/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K70 Pro leads (47/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K70 Pro leads (53/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (47/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K70 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (53/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "design" category, the Redmi K70 Pro and the Vivo Y500 are nearly equal (38/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500 is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).
| Specification | Redmi K70 Pro | Vivo Y500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2486114 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 2205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7192 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8100 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.9×75.0×8.2 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 210 g | |
| Price | $465 | $345 |
Redmi K70 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y500
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Redmi K70 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K70 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y500
- 8100 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $120. Vivo Y500 is cheaper by $120.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (47/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K70 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (53/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi K70 Pro and the Vivo Y500 are nearly equal (38/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500 is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).
Which is better: the Redmi K70 Pro or the Vivo Y500?
The Redmi K70 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 by 22 points (58/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi K70 Pro and the Vivo Y500?
The Redmi K70 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo Y500 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi K70 Pro or the Vivo Y500?
The Redmi K70 Pro leads on camera score (53/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi K70 Pro or the Vivo Y500?
The Redmi K70 Pro leads on performance (47/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi K70 Pro over the Vivo Y500?
The Redmi K70 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y500 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.