Redmi K100 Pro vs Vivo X300s
The Redmi K100 Pro (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K100 Pro leads — 91/100 vs 89/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K100 Pro has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 7100); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 3,531,378).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi K100 Pro
Vivo X300s
What makes Redmi K100 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 7100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 95/100)
- Longer battery life (95/100 vs 83/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 3531378
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi K100 Pro vs the Vivo X300s, the Redmi K100 Pro scores 2 points higher (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro leads (95/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro and the Vivo X300s are nearly equal (96/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s and the Redmi K100 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 83/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi K100 Pro | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3531378 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2608 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 9000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Weight | — | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Redmi K100 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Redmi K100 Pro
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi K100 Pro
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi K100 Pro and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Redmi K100 Pro by 4.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi K100 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K100 Pro and the Vivo X300s are nearly equal (96/100 vs 95/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s and the Redmi K100 Pro are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K100 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 83/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi K100 Pro or the Vivo X300s?
The Redmi K100 Pro edges out the Vivo X300s by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi K100 Pro and the Vivo X300s?
The Redmi K100 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Should you choose the Redmi K100 Pro over the Vivo X300s?
The Redmi K100 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.