Redmi A3X vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Redmi A3X (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $80 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 21/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 193,858); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi A3X doesn't; the Redmi A3X is noticeably lighter (192g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X by 63 points (84/100 vs 21/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi A3X

Performance 11
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 43
Portability 61
Value for money 38

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

What makes Redmi A3X better?

  • Lighter: 192g vs 214g
  • Cheaper at launch: $80 vs $1299

  • Better portability (61/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 193858
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 189
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 781
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 10W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 11/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi A3X vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 63 points higher (84/100 vs 21/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Redmi A3X — 38/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X (96/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X (88/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi A3X (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi A3X is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi A3X Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G36 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 193858 3463142
Geekbench Single 189 3601
Geekbench Multi 781 10686
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1650 3120x1440
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 10W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) — 157
Main camera 8 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 12 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, MIUI Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 500 nits 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 168.4×76.3×8.3 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 192 g 214 g
Launch price $80 $1299

Camera comparison

Redmi A3X

  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Redmi A3X

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1650
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Redmi A3X

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 10W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi A3X and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi A3X MediaTek Helio G36
21/100
193858 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +94.4%
3463142 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Redmi A3X by 94.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi A3X

$80

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $1219. Redmi A3X was $1219 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X (96/100 vs 11/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X (88/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X (86/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi A3X (61/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi A3X is a bit better (61/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi A3X or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi A3X by 63 points (84/100 vs 21/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi A3X and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Redmi A3X has a MobileRank rating of 21/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi A3X or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi A3X or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 11/100).

Should you choose the Redmi A3X over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.