Redmi 6A vs Tecno Spark 4 Lite

The Redmi 6A (2018) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Tecno Spark 4 Lite (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite leads — 19/100 vs 17/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 4 Lite has the bigger battery (4000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 8 MP.

The Tecno Spark 4 Lite edges out the Redmi 6A by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi 6A

Performance 10
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 80
Value for money 26

Tecno Spark 4 Lite

Performance 10
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 32
Portability 48
Value for money —

What makes Redmi 6A better?

  • Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Tecno Spark 4 Lite better?

  • Bigger battery: 4000 vs 3000 mAh

  • Longer battery life (32/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (39/100 vs 32/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 6A vs the Tecno Spark 4 Lite, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite scores 2 points higher (19/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite leads (32/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite notably outperforms the Redmi 6A (32/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 6A significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 4 Lite (80/100 vs 48/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi 6A Tecno Spark 4 Lite
Processor MediaTek Helio A22 MediaTek Helio A22
AnTuTu 155362 155362
Geekbench Single 300 300
Geekbench Multi 486 486
Display 5.5" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution — 720x1600
Refresh rate 60 Hz —
Battery 3000 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging — —
Main camera 13 MP 8 MP
Front camera 5 MP 8 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 2GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 32GB
OS — Android 9.0 (Pie); HIOS 5.5
NFC no no
Dimensions 147.5×71.5×8.3 mm 166.7×75.8×8.4 mm
Weight 145 g —
Launch price $90 —

Camera comparison

Redmi 6A

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Tecno Spark 4 Lite

  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Redmi 6A

  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display

Tecno Spark 4 Lite

  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Redmi 6A

  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery

Tecno Spark 4 Lite

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
32
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 6A and Tecno Spark 4 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 6A MediaTek Helio A22
17/100
155362 AnTuTu
Tecno Spark 4 Lite MediaTek Helio A22
19/100
155362 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi 6A

$90

Tecno Spark 4 Lite

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite notably outperforms the Redmi 6A (32/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi 6A significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 4 Lite (80/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi 6A or the Tecno Spark 4 Lite?

The Tecno Spark 4 Lite edges out the Redmi 6A by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Redmi 6A and the Tecno Spark 4 Lite?

The Redmi 6A has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Tecno Spark 4 Lite — 19/100.

Should you choose the Redmi 6A over the Tecno Spark 4 Lite?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Redmi 6A (80/100 vs 48/100).