Redmi 4X vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

The Redmi 4X (2017) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $120 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads — 61/100 vs 12/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has the bigger battery (4400 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 150,628); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 4X doesn't; the Redmi 4X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X by 49 points (61/100 vs 12/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 4X
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 14
Design 100
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 76
Battery 25
Design 31
Value for money 0
What makes Redmi 4X better?
  • Lighter: 150g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $120 vs $1999

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 150628
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 141
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 618
  • Bigger battery: 4400 vs 4100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (25/100 vs 14/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 4X vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 49 points higher (61/100 vs 12/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (25/100 vs 14/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4X leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (25/100 vs 14/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 4X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (100/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (100/100 vs 0/100).

Redmi 4X: The Redmi 4X is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 4X Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 150628 3065623
Geekbench Single 141 2910
Geekbench Multi 618 9174
Display 5.0" IPS LCD 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2184x1968
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4100 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 145
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 5 MP 10 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 139.2×70.0×8.7 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 150 g 215 g
Price $120 $1999
Camera comparison
Redmi 4X
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 4X
  • 5.0" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 4X
  • 4100 mAh
  • No wireless charging
14
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
25
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 4X and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 4X Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
12/100
150628 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
61/100 +95.1%
3065623 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Redmi 4X by 95.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 4X
$120
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
$1999

Price difference: $1879. Redmi 4X is cheaper by $1879.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X (76/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a bit better (25/100 vs 14/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi 4X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (100/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 4X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (100/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 4X or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Redmi 4X by 49 points (61/100 vs 12/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi 4X and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Redmi 4X has a MobileRank rating of 12/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 4X or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 4X or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 4X over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7?

The Redmi 4X is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users.