Redmi 3S vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
The Redmi 3S (2016) is priced at $120, the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) at $105. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads — 25/100 vs 12/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A76 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP.
Redmi 3S
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper: $105 vs $120
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 14/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Redmi 3S vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the ZTE Blade A76 4G scores 13 points higher (25/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (36/100 vs 14/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (36/100 vs 14/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Redmi 3S | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 180440 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 827 | — | |
| Display | 5.0" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4100 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | — | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 16GB / 32GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 139.3×69.6×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 144 g | — | |
| Price | $120 | $105 |
Redmi 3S
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Redmi 3S
- 5.0" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Redmi 3S
- 4100 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $15. ZTE Blade A76 4G is cheaper by $15.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (36/100 vs 14/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Redmi 3S or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G is noticeably better than the Redmi 3S — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Redmi 3S and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Redmi 3S has a MobileRank rating of 12/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 3S or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The ZTE Blade A76 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 3S over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Redmi 3S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.