Redmi 17C vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Redmi 17C (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $100 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 33/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 358,383); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 17C doesn't; the Redmi 17C is noticeably lighter (206g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 17C
Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 10
Battery 54
Portability 53
Value for money 50
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
What makes Redmi 17C better?
  • Lighter: 206g vs 227g
  • Cheaper: $100 vs $799

  • Better portability (53/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1416
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5160 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better value for money (90/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 17C vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 56 points higher (89/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (99/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi 17C notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (90/100 vs 50/100).

Redmi 17C: The Redmi 17C is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 17C Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 358383 4602290
Geekbench Single 432 3640
Geekbench Multi 1416 11033
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1640 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 18W 120W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 8000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 206 g 227 g
Price $100 $799
Camera comparison
Redmi 17C
  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 17C
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 17C
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • Wireless charging: no data
54
battery
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 17C and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 17C MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
33/100
358383 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +92.2%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Redmi 17C by 92.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 17C
$100
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799

Price difference: $699. Redmi 17C is cheaper by $699.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (99/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (99/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (78/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (92/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi 17C notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (90/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 17C or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi 17C and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi 17C has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 17C or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 17C or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 17C over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Redmi 17C is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.