Redmi 17C vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

The Redmi 17C (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $100 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 25/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi 17C has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 358,383); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 17C doesn't.

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C by 46 points (71/100 vs 25/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 17C
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 0
Battery 40
Design 42
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 64
Battery 51
Design 31
Value for money 0
What makes Redmi 17C better?
  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 206g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $100 vs $2199

  • Better design/ergonomics (42/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1416
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (64/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 17C vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 46 points higher (71/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 17C leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (64/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 17C is a bit better (42/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 17C significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).

Redmi 17C: The Redmi 17C is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 17C Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 358383 3942923
Geekbench Single 432 3640
Geekbench Multi 1416 11033
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1640 1968x2184
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 5 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP48
Weight 206 g 215 g
Price $100 $2199
Camera comparison
Redmi 17C
  • Main: 13MP f/2.2
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 17C
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 17C
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
40
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 17C and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 17C MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
25/100
358383 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
71/100 +90.9%
3942923 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Redmi 17C by 90.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 17C
$100
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
$2199

Price difference: $2099. Redmi 17C is cheaper by $2099.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (92/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C (64/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi 17C is a bit better (42/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 17C significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 17C or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 17C by 46 points (71/100 vs 25/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi 17C and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Redmi 17C has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 17C or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (64/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 17C or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 17C over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Redmi 17C is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.