Redmi 15C 4G vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

The Redmi 15C 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $103 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads — 63/100 vs 32/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi 15C 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 3900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is faster in AnTuTu (3,034,849 vs 358,383); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is noticeably lighter (163g vs 205g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G by 31 points (63/100 vs 32/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 15C 4G
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 24
Battery 48
Design 43
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Performance 68
Display 100
Camera 73
Battery 13
Design 96
Value for money 34
What makes Redmi 15C 4G better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 3900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
  • Cheaper: $103 vs $1099

  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 13/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3034849 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2970 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9490 vs 1416
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 163g vs 205g

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (73/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (96/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 15C 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge scores 31 points higher (63/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads (73/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi 15C 4G leads (48/100 vs 13/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 15C 4G leads (100/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G (68/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G (73/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi 15C 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (48/100 vs 13/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 15C 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (100/100 vs 34/100).

Redmi 15C 4G: The Redmi 15C 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 15C 4G Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 358383 3034849
Geekbench Single 432 2970
Geekbench Multi 1416 9490
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 3900 mAh
Charging 33W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 140
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Front camera 8 MP 12 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15, HyperOS 2 Android 15 / One UI 7
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm 158.2×75.6×5.8 mm
Weight 205 g 163 g
Price $103 $1099
Camera comparison
Redmi 15C 4G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
73
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 15C 4G
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 15C 4G
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
  • 3900 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
13
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 15C 4G and Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 15C 4G MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
32/100
358383 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
63/100 +88.2%
3034849 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads Redmi 15C 4G by 88.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 15C 4G
$103
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge
$1099

Price difference: $996. Redmi 15C 4G is cheaper by $996.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G (68/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G (73/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi 15C 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (48/100 vs 13/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G (96/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 15C 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge (100/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 15C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge significantly outperforms the Redmi 15C 4G by 31 points (63/100 vs 32/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi 15C 4G and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge?

The Redmi 15C 4G has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 15C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads on camera score (73/100 vs 24/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi 15C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge leads on performance (68/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 15C 4G over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge?

The Redmi 15C 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge is a better fit for active users.